Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/866
Title: | Influence of a hyaluronan-binding system for sperm selection in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles on embryo morphokinetic parameters and in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes | Authors: | Emirdar, Volkan Karatasli, Volkan Tamer, Burcu Pala, Ibrahim Gunturkun, Fatma Ozbaykus, Canberk Isik, Ahmet Zeki |
Keywords: | Intracytoplasmic sperm injection Physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection Time-lapse monitoring Embryo morphokinetics Clinical pregnancy Chromatin-Structure Icsi Cycles Pregnancy Spermatozoa Infertility Blastocyst Integrity |
Publisher: | Springer Heidelberg | Abstract: | PurposeAlthough the impact of the paternal contribution to embryo quality and blastocyst formation is a well-known phenomenon, the current literature provides insufficient evidence that hyaluronan-binding sperm selection methods improve assisted reproductive treatment outcomes. Thus, we compared the cycle outcomes of morphologically selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with hyaluronan binding physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI) cycles.MethodsA total of 2415 ICSI and 400 PICSI procedures of 1630 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles using a time-lapse monitoring system between 2014 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Fertilization rate, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were evaluated, differences in morphokinetic parameters and cycle outcomes were compared.ResultsIn total, 85.8 and 14.2% of the whole cohort were fertilized with standard ICSI and PICSI, respectively. The proportion of fertilized oocytes did not significantly differ between groups (74.53 +/- 1.33 vs. 72.92 +/- 2.64, p > 0.05). Similarly, the proportion of good-quality embryos according to the time-lapse parameters and the clinical pregnancy rate did not significantly differ between groups (71.93 +/- 4.21 vs. 71.33 +/- 2.64, p > 0.05 and 45.55 +/- 2.91 vs. 44.96 +/- 1.25, p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in clinical pregnancy rates (45.55 +/- 2.91 vs. 44.96 +/- 1.25, p > 0.05). Biochemical pregnancy rates (11.24 +/- 2.12 vs. 10.85 +/- 1.83, p > 0.05) and miscarriage rates (24.89 +/- 3.74 vs. 27.91 +/- 4.91, p > 0.05) were not significantly different between groups.ConclusionThe effects of the PICSI procedure on fertilization rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, embryo quality, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were not superior. The effect of the PICSI procedure on embryo morphokinetics was not apparent when all parameters were considered. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06992-z https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/866 |
ISSN: | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
866.pdf Restricted Access | 584.15 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
52
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
8
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.