Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Santoyo-Medina, Carme"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Perceived and Performed Dual-Task Ability in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: an International Multi-Centered Study
    (Sage Publications Ltd, 2024) Abasiyanik, Zuhal; Pedulla, Ludovico; Soler, Bernardita; Santoyo-Medina, Carme; Kahraman, Turhan; D'Hooge, Mieke; Tacchino, Andrea
    [No abstract available]
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-Report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: an International Study
    (W B Saunders Co-elsevier inc, 2025) Abasiyanik, Zuhal; Pedulla, Ludovico; Kahraman, Turhan; D'Hooge, Mieke; Santoyo-Medina, Carme; Soler, Bernardita; Feys, Peter
    Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the dual-tasking questionnaire (DTQ), dual-task screening list (DTSL), and dual-task impact on daily life activities questionnaire (DIDA-Q). Design: Multicenter, cross-sectional study Setting: Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were recruited from 7 multiple sclerosis centers across 6 countries (Belgium, Chile, Italy, Israel, Spain, and Turkey). Participants: A total of 356 pwMS (mean age 47.5 +/- 11.5y, expanded disability status scale, 3.79 +/- 1.83) were enrolled. Interventions: Not applicable Main Outcome Measures: The reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and measurement error) and construct validity (structural and convergent) were assessed. Results: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [95% CI], 0.84 [0.80-0.87] to 0.90 [0.87-0.92]) and internal consistency (Cronbach a: 0.86-0.96). As hypothesized, the 3 questionnaires showed a strong correlation with each other, moderate-to-strong correlations with other self-report questionnaires (perceived walking difficulties, fatigue, and fear of falling), and low- to-moderate correlations with cognitive information processing speed, manual dexterity, and dual-task walking performance (walking with word list generation task), showing convergent validity. The DIDA-Q exhibited systematically superior properties. These results were also verified in subsets from 6 different countries. In the structural validity analysis, all questionnaires displayed 2 main factors, allocated as "motor-driven" and "cognitive-driven" subscales. Conclusions: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q have good-to-excellent measurement properties, with the highest properties observed in DIDA-Q. The use of these self-reported questionnaires can be used in research and clinical practice to assess the effect of dual-task difficulties on the daily life of ambulatory pwMS. (c) 2024 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback