Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-Report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: an International Study

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

W B Saunders Co-elsevier inc

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the dual-tasking questionnaire (DTQ), dual-task screening list (DTSL), and dual-task impact on daily life activities questionnaire (DIDA-Q). Design: Multicenter, cross-sectional study Setting: Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were recruited from 7 multiple sclerosis centers across 6 countries (Belgium, Chile, Italy, Israel, Spain, and Turkey). Participants: A total of 356 pwMS (mean age 47.5 +/- 11.5y, expanded disability status scale, 3.79 +/- 1.83) were enrolled. Interventions: Not applicable Main Outcome Measures: The reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and measurement error) and construct validity (structural and convergent) were assessed. Results: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [95% CI], 0.84 [0.80-0.87] to 0.90 [0.87-0.92]) and internal consistency (Cronbach a: 0.86-0.96). As hypothesized, the 3 questionnaires showed a strong correlation with each other, moderate-to-strong correlations with other self-report questionnaires (perceived walking difficulties, fatigue, and fear of falling), and low- to-moderate correlations with cognitive information processing speed, manual dexterity, and dual-task walking performance (walking with word list generation task), showing convergent validity. The DIDA-Q exhibited systematically superior properties. These results were also verified in subsets from 6 different countries. In the structural validity analysis, all questionnaires displayed 2 main factors, allocated as "motor-driven" and "cognitive-driven" subscales. Conclusions: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q have good-to-excellent measurement properties, with the highest properties observed in DIDA-Q. The use of these self-reported questionnaires can be used in research and clinical practice to assess the effect of dual-task difficulties on the daily life of ambulatory pwMS. (c) 2024 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Description

Kalron, Prof. Alon/0000-0001-7999-0868; Meza Murillo, Edwin Roger/0000-0001-6065-3546; Kos, Daphne/0000-0003-3566-2269; Abasiyanik, Zuhal/0000-0003-3086-8102

Keywords

Dual Task, Gait, Multiple Sclerosis, Patient-Reported Outcome Mea- Sure, Rehabilitation, Reliability, Validity

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Volume

106

Issue

2

Start Page

230

End Page

238
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 3

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 17

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.7596

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.