Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-Report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: an International Study

dc.contributor.author Abasiyanik, Zuhal
dc.contributor.author Pedulla, Ludovico
dc.contributor.author Kahraman, Turhan
dc.contributor.author D'Hooge, Mieke
dc.contributor.author Santoyo-Medina, Carme
dc.contributor.author Soler, Bernardita
dc.contributor.author Feys, Peter
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-25T19:23:44Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-25T19:23:44Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description Kalron, Prof. Alon/0000-0001-7999-0868; Meza Murillo, Edwin Roger/0000-0001-6065-3546; Kos, Daphne/0000-0003-3566-2269; Abasiyanik, Zuhal/0000-0003-3086-8102 en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the dual-tasking questionnaire (DTQ), dual-task screening list (DTSL), and dual-task impact on daily life activities questionnaire (DIDA-Q). Design: Multicenter, cross-sectional study Setting: Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were recruited from 7 multiple sclerosis centers across 6 countries (Belgium, Chile, Italy, Israel, Spain, and Turkey). Participants: A total of 356 pwMS (mean age 47.5 +/- 11.5y, expanded disability status scale, 3.79 +/- 1.83) were enrolled. Interventions: Not applicable Main Outcome Measures: The reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and measurement error) and construct validity (structural and convergent) were assessed. Results: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [95% CI], 0.84 [0.80-0.87] to 0.90 [0.87-0.92]) and internal consistency (Cronbach a: 0.86-0.96). As hypothesized, the 3 questionnaires showed a strong correlation with each other, moderate-to-strong correlations with other self-report questionnaires (perceived walking difficulties, fatigue, and fear of falling), and low- to-moderate correlations with cognitive information processing speed, manual dexterity, and dual-task walking performance (walking with word list generation task), showing convergent validity. The DIDA-Q exhibited systematically superior properties. These results were also verified in subsets from 6 different countries. In the structural validity analysis, all questionnaires displayed 2 main factors, allocated as "motor-driven" and "cognitive-driven" subscales. Conclusions: The DTQ, DTSL, and DIDA-Q have good-to-excellent measurement properties, with the highest properties observed in DIDA-Q. The use of these self-reported questionnaires can be used in research and clinical practice to assess the effect of dual-task difficulties on the daily life of ambulatory pwMS. (c) 2024 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship RIMS; European Network for Best Practice and Research in MS Rehabilitation en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was funded by a grant (RiGra) provided by RIMS, European Network for Best Practice and Research in MS Rehabilitation (www.eurims.org) en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.024
dc.identifier.issn 0003-9993
dc.identifier.issn 1532-821X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85208540039 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85208540039
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.024
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5722
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher W B Saunders Co-elsevier inc en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Dual Task en_US
dc.subject Gait en_US
dc.subject Multiple Sclerosis en_US
dc.subject Patient-Reported Outcome Mea- Sure en_US
dc.subject Rehabilitation en_US
dc.subject Reliability en_US
dc.subject Validity en_US
dc.title Reliability and Construct Validity of Three Self-Report Questionnaires Assessing Dual-Task Difficulties in People With Multiple Sclerosis: an International Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Kalron, Prof. Alon/0000-0001-7999-0868
gdc.author.id Meza Murillo, Edwin Roger/0000-0001-6065-3546
gdc.author.id Kos, Daphne/0000-0003-3566-2269
gdc.author.id Abasiyanik, Zuhal/0000-0003-3086-8102
gdc.author.wosid Kalron, Alon/Aat-2960-2021
gdc.author.wosid Kahraman, Turhan/O-5499-2015
gdc.author.wosid Abasıyanık, Zuhal/R-9080-2017
gdc.author.wosid Kos, Daphne/G-4376-2011
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Abasiyanik, Zuhal; D'Hooge, Mieke; Veldkamp, Renee; Feys, Peter] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, Hasselt, Belgium; [Abasiyanik, Zuhal; D'Hooge, Mieke; Veldkamp, Renee; Feys, Peter] Univ MS Ctr UMSC, Hasselt Pelt, Belgium; [Abasiyanik, Zuhal; Kahraman, Turhan] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkiye; [Pedulla, Ludovico; Tacchino, Andrea] Italian Multiple Sclerosis Fdn FISM, Sci Res Area, Genoa, Italy; [D'Hooge, Mieke; Kos, Daphne] Natl MS Ctr, Melsbroek, Belgium; [Santoyo-Medina, Carme; Meza-Murillo, Edwin-Roger] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Neurorehabil Unit, Multiple Sclerosis Ctr Catalonia Cemcat, Barcelona, Spain; [Santoyo-Medina, Carme] Univ Int Catalunya, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Barcelona, Spain; [Soler, Bernardita; Ciampi, Ethel] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Hosp Doctor Sotero Rio, Santiago, Chile; [Omar, Areen; Kalron, Alon] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Phys Therapy, Tel Aviv, Israel; [Omar, Areen; Kalron, Alon] Sheba Med Ctr, Multiple Sclerosis Ctr, Tel Hashomer, Israel; [Ozakbas, Serkan] Izmir Univ Econ, Med Point Hosp, Dept Neurol, Izmir, Turkiye; [Kos, Daphne] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, Leuven, Belgium; [Abasiyanik, Zuhal] Univ Hasselt, Fac Rehabil Sci, Wetenschapspk 5-7, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium en_US
gdc.description.endpage 238 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 230 en_US
gdc.description.volume 106 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4403295515
gdc.identifier.pmid 39395710 en_US
gdc.identifier.pmid 39395710
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001421661200001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.7596
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.85
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 17
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 3
gdc.scopus.citedcount 3
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319

Files