TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/4
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Article How the Past Becomes Tradition: Gadamer and Foucault on The Hermeneutics of Hİstory(2024) Gürsoy, A. ÖzgürGünümüzde yaşadığımız yoğun ve çok boyutlu krizler, bizleri geçmişin geleneğe dönüşümünü sorunsallaştırmaya teşvik etmektedir. Bu sorunun zorluklarını düşünmemizde faydalı iki düşünür Gadamer ve Foucault’dur. Bu makalenin argümanı, Gadamer ve Foucault’nun çalışmaları arasında etkili bir karşılaşma olduğu ve bu karşılaşmanın geçmişin şimdiki zamandaki figürleri ile ilişkimizi anlamamızda faydalı olduğudur. Bu karşılaşmanın görünür kıldığı şey, geleneğin şimdiki zamanda zaten ve hep çatışmalı olduğu ve ‘ufukların birleşimini’ varsayan bir araştırma yönteminin bu çatışmanın varlığıyla yeterince yüzleşemediğidir.Article The Communicability of Pleasure and the Pleasure of Communication: The “obligation” of Aesthetic Feeling in the Critique of the Power of Judgment(2024-06-03) Gürsoy, A. ÖzgürKant makes a puzzling claim in the Critique of the Power of Judgment concerning the connection between the feeling of pleasure occasioned by the appreciation of an object as beautiful and the universal communicability of this aesthetic feeling: on the one hand, he claims that this feeling is due to the free play of the faculties of imagination and understanding, and on the other hand, that it has its ground in the very communicability of this pleasure. The central argument of the present study is that it is possible to clarify the relation between the feeling of pleasure occasioned by the reflective judging of an object and the universal communica- bility Kant attributes to such a judging by grasping the demand for a ‘universality without concept’ claimed by a pure judgment of taste in terms of what appears to be a problematic relationship of grounding between the shareability of pure aesthetic feeling and the reflective activity of the mind. I will claim that this relationship can be rendered clearer by an explication of the ‘share’ of disinterestedness, purposiveness, and subjective universal validity claims in pure judgments of taste and brought together in the notion of a common sense (sensus communis). What thereby comes into view is an original orientation in the world that is presupposed by explicitly theoretical and practical judgments.Article Historical Action and Narrative in the Context of Historiography in Ricoeur and Ranciere(2024-05-07) Gürsoy, A. ÖzgürThe argument of this study is that a critical encounter between the ‘historiographical’ texts of Ricoeur and Rancière on the theme of historical action and narrative provides us with a fruitful approach to the political stakes of the act of writing history. More specifically, I claim that attention to how these two authors frame narrative agency in the construction of our identities in history reveals two points of salience that give orientation to our attitude toward history, namely, disruption and harmony. Framing history as a problem in this way makes visible the centrality of how to conceive agency within the two poles of modern existence: on the one hand, statistical regularities that govern behavior in the form of impersonal forces and, on the other, individual projects, the trajectories of which form a coherent life (and define autonomy for the subject). The merit of narrative history is to bridge these poles; but it thereby occludes the antagonisms characteristic of modernity. It is in order to make these visible that we need a disruptive attention to the way narratives are constructed retrospectively.Article Cjeu and Ecthr: Two Sides of the Same Coin or Different Currencies ?(2017) Bulak Uygun, Begüm; Uygun, Begüm BulakThe protection of fundamental human rights across Europe reminds the issue of the European Union (EU) accession to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The analysis of the interaction between the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is essential for a better understanding of the multi-layered human rights architecture in Europe.With reference to multi-level components, this study focus on the following issues in order to find out whether the CJEU and ECtHR consist two sides of the same coin - meaning that they adjudicate human rights in the same way - or if they constitute different currencies – meaning that they have different impacts in human rights protection. An overall appraisal of the cohabitation of these two judicial powerhouses will be made by reference to the state of human rights protection within the regional mechanisms and their impact at national level.