TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/4
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Article Carotis Intima-Media Thickness, Coronary Calcium Score at Different Stages of Coronary Artery Disease(Dokuz Eylul Univ Inst Health Sciences, 2024-09-30) Okan, Taha; Doruk, Mehmet; Ozturk, Ali; Topaloglu, Caner; Yilmaz, Mehmet BirhanPurpose: Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CACS) and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness (CIMT) are surrogate markers for atherosclerosis. CACS is a recognized indicator of coronary artery disease (CAD), but CIMT's role in CAD diagnosis is debated. This study aimed to assess how well CIMT and CACS predict CAD presence and severity as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Materials and Methods: In the study, 88 participants (57 CAD and 31 controls) underwent coronary angiography and CACS calculation using computerized tomography and CIMT measured according to the guidelines. Patients with CAD were classified by CACT results and further subdivided by CACS into three groups: Group I (<100), Group II (100-300), and Group III (>= 300). The relationship between CIMT and CAD groups with zero Agatston scores, as well as the control group, was also examined. Results: The CACS had 82% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting CAD, excluding CAD with 75.6% specificity. A CIMT max cut-off of >= 0.78 mm showed 76% sensitivity and 54% specificity for CAD. A CIMT max cut-off of >= 1.03 mm had 93% specificity but only 35% sensitivity, while <= 0.59 mm excluded CAD with 96% specificity but just 10% sensitivity. Patients with CIMT levels between 0.59 mm and 1.03 mm may need further testing to assess CAD risk accurately. Conclusion: The CACS is more sensitive than CIMT in predicting CAD, and CIMT is not helpful when the CACS is zero. Determining an optimal CIMT cutoff for CAD prediction is challenging, and patients with CIMT between 0.59 mm and 1.03 mm may require additional testing.Article The Responses of Radiology Professionals To the Covid-19 Pandemic(Dokuz Eylul Univ Inst Health Sciences, 2022-09-29) Alkan, Turkan; Çilengiroğlu, Özgül VupaPurpose: This study aimed to investigate radiology professionals’ response to the impact of COVID-19 on professional practice. In addition, the fear and anxiety levels experienced by this workforce during the pandemic process were investigated. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted. The questionnaire covered information on demographic characteristics, the Coronavirus Overviews and Impacts, the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between \"CAS\" and \"Fear\" scores and variables. Data collected was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (v.24). Results: A total of 290 responses were received, comprising 21.7% radiologists and 78.3% technicians. The key contributor factors to work-related stress were found to be the fear of COVID-19 infection, with 63.8%, the increase in workload, with 17.6% and inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE), with 11%. The percentages of anxiety were 75.6% for technician and 24.4% for radiologist. It was found that there was a significant association between \"CAS\" score and the gender variable (p=0.030<0.05), and similarly, between \"Fear\" score and gender (p-value=0.003) and age (p-value=0.080) variables. The women are 2.205 times more likely to be anxious than men (p=0.033) and 2.106 times more likely to be fear (p=0.003). Conclusion: Almost half of the participants reported adequate PPE availability during the study period. Despite this, most feared being infected with COVID-19. Therefore, it is important to provide timely and adequate personnel training, adequate availability of PPE and regular psychosocial support for radiology professinals, during future pandemics.