Döğerlioğlu Işıksungur, Özlem

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Işıksungur, Özlem Döğerlioğlu
Isiksungur, Ozlem Dogerlioglu
Dogerlioglu Isiksungur, Ozlem
Job Title
Email Address
ozlem.dogerlioglu@ieu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
08.01. Law
Status
Former Staff
Website
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

0/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

3

Scopus Citation Count

3

WoS h-index

1

Scopus h-index

1

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

3.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

3.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Sustainability1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 3
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    How Realistic Are Coal Phase-Out Timeline Targets for Turkey?
    (MDPI, 2024) Uyanık, Sırrı; Döğerlioğlu Işıksungur, Özlem
    Coal phase-out is considered to be critical to the success of energy transition for all countries. Yet, recent assessments indicate that energy security aspects may affect phase-out plans and/or commitments and jeopardize energy transition ambitions. This study aims to question to what extent coal phase-out targets for Turkiye are realistic. Although previous research has mainly focused on direct emission reduction targets and just transition aspects, we include a down-to-earth discussion of the potential challenges before coal phase-out. The interaction between phasing-out coal power generation and energy security aspects is also analyzed. To understand the coal phase-out timeline targets, its limitations, and constraints within the framework of future power projections, a supply-demand model with different scenarios was developed. In addition, energy storage was also discussed as an option. Analysis revealed that energy storage, in the short- and medium-term, may not be the panacea, as it may not be deployed in the scale to substitute the energy security that coal provided. Moreover, our findings indicate that phasing-out is not as simple as assumed. A target timeline is certainly not realistic considering the energy security aspect and challenges. On the other hand, economically nonviable and technically nonavailable coal-fired power plants in the power system may retire gradually (as a natural phase-out process). This may occur even without waiting for the target timeline, if there would ever officially be one.