Approaches To Teaching and Learning Through Eap
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Mumford, S.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Nature
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This chapter focuses on methodological approaches to teaching and learning English for Academic Purposes (EAP). We focus on two key developments: Todd's (in Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2:147-156, 2003) six principles of EAP, and academic literacies theory. These emerged from different disciplines, EAP and L1 academic writing, respectively, but have much in common, and their convergence has the potential to shape the future of EAP. These represent the practical (Todd, 2003) and the more theoretical aspects (academic literacies) of second language (L2) academic language learning. To focus on the practical nexus, we discuss Todd's (2003) six principles: inductive learning, process syllabuses, learner autonomy, authentic materials and tasks, technology, and team teaching, and discuss their application to various methodological approaches, such as task-based learning, project-based learning, and English medium of instruction. In the second part, we examine the theory of 'academic literacies,' referring to the move away from a mere focus on texts toward greater inclusivity and diversity. We emphasize that 'methods' can include personal approaches as well as institutional ones. We provide implications for EAP teachers to examine their own beliefs about EAP methodology. The chapter concludes with practical guidance on approaches to teaching. We argue that, for EAP, teacher and student autonomy are key to finding methodological balance. © The Author(s). All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Clil, Eap Pedagogy, Egap, Esap, Principles Of Eap, Teaching Eap
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Teaching English for Academic Purposes: Theory into Practice
Volume
Issue
Start Page
39
End Page
62
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


