A Deterministic Fluid Model for Production and Energy Mode Control of a Single Machine

dc.contributor.author Tan, B.
dc.contributor.author Karabağ, O.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-25T15:17:57Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-25T15:17:57Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract Improving machines’ energy efficiency through dynamic energy mode control to meet demand requirements with minimal energy consumption is a promising approach. This study considers a machine operating in working, idle, off, and warmup energy modes with different energy consumption in each mode. A deterministic fluid model is developed to analyze an energy mode control policy that determines when to keep the machine working, off or idle, and switch to other modes based on the inventory/backlog level to minimize the total energy, inventory, and backlog costs. This approach facilitates the derivation of closed-form expressions for the optimal thresholds and the associated costs. This modeling approach allows us to prove that a policy that operates the machine between the working and off modes or the working and idle modes is always better than a hybrid policy that operates the machine in working, off, and idle modes simultaneously. We use the solution of the deterministic fluid model to propose an approximate policy for machines with stochastic production, warmup, and demand processes. We compare the results of the proposed approximation method with the optimal solution of a stochastic system where the production and warmup times are exponential and the demand inter-arrival times have Erlang distribution. The optimal solution for the stochastic system is determined by solving a Markovian Decision Process (MDP). Our numerical experiments show that the proposed approximation method predicts the optimal policy type for the stochastic case with a 89.3% accuracy, and the average error between the optimal cost and the cost obtained with the approximation method is 1.37% for 729 different cases tested. Furthermore, the computational efficiency of the proposed approximation is around 250 times better than the effort to determine the optimal policy using an MDP approach. We propose this approximation method where the control parameters are given in closed form as an easy-to-implement and effective policy to control energy modes to minimize the total energy, inventory, and backlog costs. Furthermore, we present the deterministic fluid modeling approach as a versatile approach to analyze energy mode control problems. © 2024 The Authors en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109418
dc.identifier.issn 0925-5273
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85205312075
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109418
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5578
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier B.V. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Production Economics en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Economic Production Quantity (EPQ) model en_US
dc.subject Energy efficiency en_US
dc.subject Manufacturing en_US
dc.subject Optimal production and energy control en_US
dc.subject Resource scheduling en_US
dc.subject Liquefied gases en_US
dc.subject Deterministics en_US
dc.subject Economic production quantity en_US
dc.subject Economic production quantity model en_US
dc.subject Energy en_US
dc.subject Energy modes en_US
dc.subject Optimal energy en_US
dc.subject Optimal production en_US
dc.subject Optimal production and energy control en_US
dc.subject Quantity models en_US
dc.subject Resource-scheduling en_US
dc.subject Stochastic control systems en_US
dc.title A Deterministic Fluid Model for Production and Energy Mode Control of a Single Machine en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional
gdc.author.scopusid 7402833947
gdc.author.scopusid 57196390808
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Tan B., Faculty of Engineering & Faculty of Business, Özyeğin University, Çekmeköy Campus Nişantepe District, Orman Street, Çekmeköy, Istanbul, 34794; Karabağ O., Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, 3000, DR, Netherlands, Department of Industrial Engineering, Izmir University of Economics, Sakarya Caddesi No:156, Balçova, Izmir, 35330 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.volume 278 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4402970254
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001331097000001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype HYBRID
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Optimal production and energy control
gdc.oaire.keywords Manufacturing
gdc.oaire.keywords Resource scheduling
gdc.oaire.keywords Energy efficiency
gdc.oaire.keywords Economic production quantity (epq) model
gdc.oaire.keywords SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.3737945E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.19
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 4
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.virtual.author Karabağ, Oktay
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 1edc4c7d-0934-44ae-a049-d2575988ad82
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 1edc4c7d-0934-44ae-a049-d2575988ad82
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication bdb88a44-c66f-45fd-b2ec-de89cb1c93a0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 26a7372c-1a5e-42d9-90b6-a3f7d14cad44
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery bdb88a44-c66f-45fd-b2ec-de89cb1c93a0

Files