How Employees Define Organisational Trust: Analysing Employee Trust in Organisation
| dc.contributor.author | Ozmen, Y. Serkan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-16T14:25:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-06-16T14:25:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose - Most business organisations try to create and maintain trustful relationships with their various stakeholders. Among all, sustaining a trustful relationship with employees has been particularly important for organisations. However, due to the multidimensional structure and changing nature of concept across settings, it is difficult to identify what makes an organisation trustworthy for its employees. The purpose of this study is to analyse the concept of organisational trust and identify how employees actually define organisational trust. Design/methodology/approach - In the study, a survey was conducted on a sample of 104 employees who were working in Turkey. Following a qualitative and quantitative approach, the data were analysed to categorise the definitions of respondents according to the theoretical framework. Findings - The findings of study closely overlap with the relevant literature, but they also extend the scope of definition with including new factors such as reputation management, strategic management or ethics and values. According to results, the perceptions of employees on organisational trust vary depending on their individual and organisational characteristics. Practical implications - The study reveals the context depending nature of organisational trust. Developing a wider sense by capturing its full meaning and reflecting the different expectations of employees can increase the trust in organisations. Originality/value - Based on the detailed review of literature, the study identifies the major dimensions of organisational trust and then reveals the similarities and differences with the literature. The study provides a viable perspective on the concept to capture its meaning in different contexts. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/JGR-04-2017-0025 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2041-2568 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2041-2576 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85050292511 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2017-0025 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1905 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Emerald Group Publishing Ltd | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Global Responsıbılıty | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trust | en_US |
| dc.subject | Employee/community engagement | en_US |
| dc.subject | Organisational trust | en_US |
| dc.subject | Corporate Social-Responsibility | en_US |
| dc.subject | Human-Resource Practices | en_US |
| dc.subject | Justice Perceptions | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ethical Leadership | en_US |
| dc.subject | Integrative Model | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trustworthiness | en_US |
| dc.subject | Performance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Commitment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Exchange | en_US |
| dc.subject | Metaanalysis | en_US |
| dc.title | How Employees Define Organisational Trust: Analysing Employee Trust in Organisation | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 57203902253 | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | metadata only access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi | en_US |
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | [Ozmen, Y. Serkan] Izmir Econ Univ, Dept Accounting & Tax Applicat, Vocat Sch, Izmir, Turkey | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 40 | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 1 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 21 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 9 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q2 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2769314242 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000424871800003 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 6.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.7764964E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 7.3294073E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0502 economics and business | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 05 social sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 3.1372 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.92 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 12 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 12 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 143 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 18 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 18 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 13 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
