The Influence of Left Ventricular Pacing Polarity on Ventricular Repolarization Parameters in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Its Clinical Reflections on Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

dc.contributor.author Abusharekh, Mohammed
dc.contributor.author Alak, Çetin
dc.contributor.author Durukan, Ahmet Barış
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, Akar
dc.contributor.author Ertürk, Emre
dc.contributor.author Özcan, Emin Evren
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-16T15:07:04Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-16T15:07:04Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of the left ventricular (LV) pacing polarities on ventricular repolarization patterns and to examine novel parameters taking depolarization into account. Patients and methods: This prospective study included a total of 54 patients (39 males, 15 females; mean age: 65.2±11.6 years; range, 40 to 89 years) with successful cardiac resynchronization therapy using quadripolar LV leads between January 2014 and February 2017. The patients were divided into two groups as the true bipolar group (n=25) and the unipolar/extended bipolar group (n=29). Ventricular repolarization parameters and novel markers, i.e., TpTe/QRS, Tpec/QRS, TpTe/(QRS ¥ QTc) and Tpec/(QRS ¥ QTc), were measured before implantation within 48 h following the procedure and at six months. Evaluation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was performed using device records during follow-up. Results: The median follow-up was 17.7 (range, 12.6 to 31.2) months. The mean ejection fraction was 23.3±5.5% in the bipolar group and 23.62±6.24% in the unipolar/extended bipolar group. Bipolar LV pacing was associated with higher Tpec/QTc values (acute, bipolar vs. unipolar, +0.011 vs. -0.0008, p=0.019; long-term, bipolar vs. unipolar, +0.005 vs. - 0.015, p=0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of other repolarization parameters. Bipolar pacing was associated with significantly higher novel markers values and more frequent sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Conclusion: The LV pacing polarity significantly affects Tpec/QTc, but not the other ventricular repolarization parameters. Novel arrhythmia predictors, i.e., TpTe/QRS, Tpec/QRS, TpTe/(QRS x QTc), and Tpec/(QRS x QTc), are more influenced in bipolar pacing associated with more frequent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5606/e-cvsi.2021.1075
dc.identifier.issn 2148-9211
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2021.1075
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/511041
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/4144
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Cardiovascular surgery and interventions en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title The Influence of Left Ventricular Pacing Polarity on Ventricular Repolarization Parameters in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Its Clinical Reflections on Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Department of Cardiology, Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey Department of Cardiology, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Salihli Private Medigüneş Hospital, Manisa, Turkey Department of Cardiology, Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey Department of Cardiology, Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey Department of Cardiology, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 52 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 44 en_US
gdc.description.volume 8 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W3154721512
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 511041
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.5483943E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.06
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.virtual.author Ertürk, Emre
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 032a496d-d5ee-419d-b35b-4443f5d9c19f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 032a496d-d5ee-419d-b35b-4443f5d9c19f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 7b4bd652-27ef-4beb-a10e-dddd2d65e0fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fbc53f3e-d1d3-4168-afd8-e42cd20bddd9
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 7b4bd652-27ef-4beb-a10e-dddd2d65e0fd

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3179.pdf
Size:
307.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format