Frame Buildings Are Not an Answer for Earthquakes: the Case of the February 2023 Earthquakes in Türkiye
| dc.contributor.author | Sönmez, E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodriguez, M.E. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-25T15:14:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-25T15:14:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The February 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye caused widespread devastation and fatalities, highlighting the critical contrast in the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings with moment-resistant frames and those with structural walls. This study employs analyses of nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems using selected accelerograms from the earthquakes to evaluate the behavior of these structural systems. Three SDOF systems representing flexible and stiffer frame buildings, alongside RC wall buildings, were examined. The results highlighted the susceptibility of frame buildings to severe damage and collapse compared with the excellent performance of RC wall buildings. Moreover, the study emphasizes a shift of design focus from life safety to functional recovery. It also identifies potential scenarios regarding consecutive earthquake effects. Overall, the findings advocate adequately designed RC wall buildings for enhanced seismic performance and immediate occupation following major earthquakes. © The Author(s) 2024. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/87552930241262753 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 8755-2930 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1944-8201 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85200250733 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930241262753 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5476 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publications Inc. | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Earthquake Spectra | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | aftershock | en_US |
| dc.subject | damage index | en_US |
| dc.subject | drift | en_US |
| dc.subject | functional recovery | en_US |
| dc.subject | post-earthquake | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reinforced concrete frames | en_US |
| dc.subject | reinforced concrete wall buildings | en_US |
| dc.subject | seismic behavior | en_US |
| dc.subject | shear wall | en_US |
| dc.subject | tunnel-form | en_US |
| dc.subject | Damage detection | en_US |
| dc.subject | Degrees of freedom (mechanics) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reinforced concrete | en_US |
| dc.subject | Seismic waves | en_US |
| dc.subject | Shear walls | en_US |
| dc.subject | Aftershock | en_US |
| dc.subject | Damage index | en_US |
| dc.subject | Drift | en_US |
| dc.subject | Functional recovery | en_US |
| dc.subject | Post-earthquake | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reinforced concrete frames | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reinforced concrete wall | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reinforced concrete wall building | en_US |
| dc.subject | Seismic behaviour | en_US |
| dc.subject | Tunnel form | en_US |
| dc.subject | Earthquakes | en_US |
| dc.title | Frame Buildings Are Not an Answer for Earthquakes: the Case of the February 2023 Earthquakes in Türkiye | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | … | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 57221782185 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55586976500 | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | metadata only access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi | en_US |
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | Sönmez E., Civil Engineering Department, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey; Rodriguez M.E., Instituto de Ingenieria, National University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 2382 | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 2364 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 40 | |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4401193565 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:001344367100014 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 11.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.9956368E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 9.910792E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0211 other engineering and technologies | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0201 civil engineering | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 3.5474 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.93 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 0 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 11 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 8 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 11 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 11 | |
| gdc.virtual.author | Sönmez, Egemen | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 8 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 69327b31-a5a6-4dc1-a7cb-08ad85f1e052 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 69327b31-a5a6-4dc1-a7cb-08ad85f1e052 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | cdb49d71-63f6-4492-aac4-0ce8f8dcc67f | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 26a7372c-1a5e-42d9-90b6-a3f7d14cad44 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | cdb49d71-63f6-4492-aac4-0ce8f8dcc67f |
