Frame Buildings Are Not an Answer for Earthquakes: the Case of the February 2023 Earthquakes in Türkiye

dc.contributor.author Sönmez, E.
dc.contributor.author Rodriguez, M.E.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-08-25T15:14:07Z
dc.date.available 2024-08-25T15:14:07Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract The February 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye caused widespread devastation and fatalities, highlighting the critical contrast in the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings with moment-resistant frames and those with structural walls. This study employs analyses of nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems using selected accelerograms from the earthquakes to evaluate the behavior of these structural systems. Three SDOF systems representing flexible and stiffer frame buildings, alongside RC wall buildings, were examined. The results highlighted the susceptibility of frame buildings to severe damage and collapse compared with the excellent performance of RC wall buildings. Moreover, the study emphasizes a shift of design focus from life safety to functional recovery. It also identifies potential scenarios regarding consecutive earthquake effects. Overall, the findings advocate adequately designed RC wall buildings for enhanced seismic performance and immediate occupation following major earthquakes. © The Author(s) 2024. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/87552930241262753
dc.identifier.issn 8755-2930
dc.identifier.issn 1944-8201
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85200250733
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930241262753
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5476
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher SAGE Publications Inc. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Earthquake Spectra en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject aftershock en_US
dc.subject damage index en_US
dc.subject drift en_US
dc.subject functional recovery en_US
dc.subject post-earthquake en_US
dc.subject Reinforced concrete frames en_US
dc.subject reinforced concrete wall buildings en_US
dc.subject seismic behavior en_US
dc.subject shear wall en_US
dc.subject tunnel-form en_US
dc.subject Damage detection en_US
dc.subject Degrees of freedom (mechanics) en_US
dc.subject Reinforced concrete en_US
dc.subject Seismic waves en_US
dc.subject Shear walls en_US
dc.subject Aftershock en_US
dc.subject Damage index en_US
dc.subject Drift en_US
dc.subject Functional recovery en_US
dc.subject Post-earthquake en_US
dc.subject Reinforced concrete frames en_US
dc.subject Reinforced concrete wall en_US
dc.subject Reinforced concrete wall building en_US
dc.subject Seismic behaviour en_US
dc.subject Tunnel form en_US
dc.subject Earthquakes en_US
dc.title Frame Buildings Are Not an Answer for Earthquakes: the Case of the February 2023 Earthquakes in Türkiye en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional
gdc.author.scopusid 57221782185
gdc.author.scopusid 55586976500
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Sönmez E., Civil Engineering Department, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey; Rodriguez M.E., Instituto de Ingenieria, National University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico en_US
gdc.description.endpage 2382
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 2364
gdc.description.volume 40
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4401193565
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001344367100014
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 11.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.9956368E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 9.910792E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0211 other engineering and technologies
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0201 civil engineering
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.5474
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.93
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 11
gdc.plumx.mendeley 8
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 11
gdc.scopus.citedcount 11
gdc.virtual.author Sönmez, Egemen
gdc.wos.citedcount 8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 69327b31-a5a6-4dc1-a7cb-08ad85f1e052
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 69327b31-a5a6-4dc1-a7cb-08ad85f1e052
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication cdb49d71-63f6-4492-aac4-0ce8f8dcc67f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 26a7372c-1a5e-42d9-90b6-a3f7d14cad44
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery cdb49d71-63f6-4492-aac4-0ce8f8dcc67f

Files