Academic Performance Management Policy for Changing Roles of Universities in Innovation Systems

dc.contributor.author Ozcan S.
dc.contributor.author Ozyazici M.S.
dc.contributor.author Ozerdem M.B.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-16T15:00:51Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-16T15:00:51Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description InFocus Corporation;Portland State University Foundation en_US
dc.description 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET 2016 -- 4 September 2016 through 8 September 2016 -- 125891 en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study is to establish a new performance measurement method for academic actors for their changing roles in innovation systems. The widely accepted triple helix and systems of innovation models show changing and overlapping roles of academic, industrial and governmental actors. In previous innovation systems, universities were not focused on applied research and technology transfer as much as they are now. Current literature shows a changing role of universities and importance of their involvement in innovation systems. Although academic organizations' roles have changed in innovation systems, academic performance measurement systems (APMS) are not adapted to examine innovation related performance factors. Many APMS focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as; publications, research projects and patents. However, the new APMS needs to assess the activities and processes that are related to innovation, such as; technology transfer processes, collaborative innovation activities, consultancies and academic spin-offs. For this study a new APMS is applied according to the needs of universities by using a synthetic data based on an engineering department's KPIs. APMS scores are calculated based on the cumulative metric of all research and innovation activities and, weighted according to the needs and considerations of the university. The results of this study show that many of those academicians who have great performance in publications and academic research do not necessarily have high-level performance in innovative activities. In fact the results show that those who had high points in some measurements have very low performance in others. For the management point of view, it may be more effective to position academicians for different roles and assess their performance accordingly as innovation-targeted, teaching-targeted and research-targeted academicians. © 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Inc. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806533
dc.identifier.isbn 9.78E+12
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85016199845
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806533
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3584
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof PICMET 2016 - Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management For Social Innovation, Proceedings en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Benchmarking en_US
dc.subject Education en_US
dc.subject Patents and inventions en_US
dc.subject Societies and institutions en_US
dc.subject Supply chain management en_US
dc.subject Technology transfer en_US
dc.subject Academic performance en_US
dc.subject Collaborative innovation en_US
dc.subject Engineering department en_US
dc.subject Innovation activity en_US
dc.subject Innovative activities en_US
dc.subject Key performance indicators en_US
dc.subject Performance factors en_US
dc.subject Performance measurements en_US
dc.subject Innovation en_US
dc.title Academic Performance Management Policy for Changing Roles of Universities in Innovation Systems en_US
dc.type Conference Object en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 55767986400
gdc.author.scopusid 57193736339
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::conference output
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.departmenttemp Ozcan, S., Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey; Ozyazici, M.S., Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey; Ozerdem, M.B., Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 2809 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 2805 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W2576619825
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000403104502062
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5349236E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords technological innovation
gdc.oaire.keywords technology management
gdc.oaire.keywords Business and Management
gdc.oaire.keywords /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/business
gdc.oaire.popularity 8.410903E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0502 economics and business
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 05 social sciences
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.23
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 39
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 1
gdc.scopus.citedcount 1
gdc.virtual.author Özerdem, Mehmet Barış
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fbbe7f0a-9862-41a3-ba9b-ff00b09392fb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery fbbe7f0a-9862-41a3-ba9b-ff00b09392fb
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a80bcb24-4ed9-4f67-9bd1-0fb405ff202d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 26a7372c-1a5e-42d9-90b6-a3f7d14cad44
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2675.pdf
Size:
111.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format