Knowledge and Practices of Nurses Regarding Wound Healing
Loading...
Files
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Science Inc
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the knowledge and practices of nurses who work at surgical clinics regarding incisional wound healing. Design: This research was a descriptive study. Methods: The sample consisted of 393 nurses who worked at the surgical clinics of public and private hospitals. The questionnaire used to collect data was prepared by use of expert opinion based on the relevant literature review. Findings: The mean score of knowledge regarding wound healing was found to be 62.0 +/- 8.4. It was determined that as the educational level of the nurses increased, their knowledge mean score increased (P < .05). Nearly half of the nurses did not perform wound healing practices regularly, whereas more than half of the nurses did not fulfill discharge education practices on wound care regularly. Conclusions: Education should be carried out to improve knowledge, attitude, and skills of nurses concerning wound healing and care.
Description
Keywords
nursing, surgical wound healing, wound care knowledge, Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Wound Healing, Adolescent, Turkey, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Hernia, Diaphragmatic, Diaphragm, Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Length of Stay, Surgical Mesh, Respiration, Artificial, Survival Rate, Birth Weight, Regression Analysis, Prospective Studies, Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital, EMC MGC-02-53-01-A
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 0305 other medical science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
Journal of Perıanesthesıa Nursıng
Volume
33
Issue
4
Start Page
471
End Page
478
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 9
Scopus : 8
PubMed : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 133
Web of Science™ Citations
11
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Google Scholar™


