Bioprocesses for Resource Recovery From Waste Gases: Current Trends and Industrial Applications
Loading...
Files
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Air pollution is a topic of important global concern because it has contributed significantly to an increase in the earth's global warming potential and contributed to severe health and environmental impacts. In this review, the different bioreactor configurations commonly used for waste gas treatment, namely the biofilters, the bio-trickling filters and the bioscrubbers, and their industrial applications were compared in terms of the type of inoculum, the packing material/media, removal efficiency and elimination capacity. Typically, biofilters are operated under the following range of operating conditions: gas residence time = 15-60 s; gas flow rate = 50-300,000 m(3) h(-1); temperature = 15-30 ?degrees C; pH = 6.0-7.5; filter area = 100-3000 m(2); relative humidity > 95.0%; and removal efficiencies > 75.0% depending on the waste gas composition and concentration. The biotechnological approaches for resource recovery, i.e., the conversion of C1 gaseous compounds (CO, CO2 and CH4) to liquified value-added products or biofuels have been discussed. From this review, it was evident that the performances of different aerobic, anoxic and/or anaerobic lab, pilot and full-scale bioreactors for waste gas treatment and resource recovery depend on the composition, the individual concentration of pollutants present in the waste gas and the gas flow rate. Although most of the research on product recovery from waste gas is rather limited to lab/pilot-scale studies, there are some key commercialized technologies that have proven to be economical at the full-scale. Thus, this review, comprehensively presents a complete overview of the current trends and limitations of conventional waste gas treatment systems, the benefits of novel bioreactor configura-tions and their potential to be applied for resource recovery from waste gases.
Description
Keywords
Waste gas, Bioreactors, Volatile pollutants, Syngas fermentation, Elimination capacity, Resource recovery, Volatile Organic-Compounds, Anoxic Biotrickling Filter, Hydrogen-Sulfide Removal, Efficiency Microbial Electrosynthesis, Methylosinus-Trichosporium Ob3b, Clostridium-Carboxidivorans P7, Syngas Fermentation Processes, Transient-State Performance, Elemental Sulfur Recovery, Rotating Drum Biofilters, Syngas Fermentation Processes, Syngas fermentation, Volatile pollutants, Waste gas, Bioreactors, 219, Volatile Organic-Compounds, Elemental Sulfur Recovery, 219 Environmental biotechnology, Methylosinus-Trichosporium Ob3b, Rotating Drum Biofilters, Clostridium-Carboxidivorans P7, Resource recovery, Transient-State Performance, Efficiency Microbial Electrosynthesis, 620, Hydrogen-Sulfide Removal, Anoxic Biotrickling Filter, Elimination capacity
Fields of Science
0106 biological sciences, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
15
Source
Renewable & Sustaınable Energy Revıews
Volume
156
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 19
Scopus : 21
Patent Family : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 72
SCOPUS™ Citations
22
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
19
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.982
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

13
CLIMATE ACTION

14
LIFE BELOW WATER


