Coverage of Bombings for Political Advantage: Turkish On-Line News Reporting of the 2016 Ankara Attacks
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Way, Lyndon C. S.
Akan, Aysun
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
On 17 February 2016, a suicide bomber blew himself up, killing 28 people and injuring another 61 in the heart of Turkey's capital Ankara. A few hours after the attack, the Turkish government blamed Salih Neccar from the (mostly) Kurdish-Syrian People's protection Unit (YPG). Two days later, the Kurdistan Freedom Hawks (TAK) claimed responsibility and named the bomber as Abdulbaki Somer a Turkish citizen. The bombing is part of a resumption of violence in Turkey between Turkish government authorities and Kurdish groups. In this paper, we examine how on-line news stories recontextualise the bombing. We assert that news sources multimodally recontextualise the bombing in ways which are advantageous to the news organisations' owners, political alliances and supporters. By each news source representing their political interests unquestionably positive and opposition unconditionally negative, polarisation in Turkish politics is articulated. This does nothing to solve problems and heal wounds in a time of national crisis.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Multimodal critical discourse studies, Turkey, bombing, Kurds, AKP, on-line news
Fields of Science
0602 languages and literature, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 06 humanities and the arts
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
10
Source
Socıal Semıotıcs
Volume
27
Issue
5
Start Page
545
End Page
566
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 5
Scopus : 12
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
SCOPUS™ Citations
12
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
8
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Page Views
1
checked on Mar 11, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
6.0664
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING


