A Systematic Literature Review Into Simulation for Building Operations Management Theory: Reaching Beyond Positivism?
Loading...
Files
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francıs Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper examines the extent to which simulation modelling has been employed beyond positivism, particularly under post-positivist and design-science-oriented paradigms, for theory building in operations management. Our study demonstrates that existing literature reviews have neglected the aspect of theory building and the generation of technological rules from a design-science perspective. A systematic literature review appraises 53 studies, published between 1976 and 2019, revealed that classical positivist approaches predominate (40 of 53 studies), followed by directive positivist (6), classical post-positivist (5), and participatory post-positivist (2) paradigms. The review highlights the potential of simulation modelling for theory building in operations management from both positivist and post-positivist perspectives. However, the dominance of positivist approaches suggests a lack of engagement with practical implementation and comparative studies. The findings advocate for greater external validation and practitioner involvement, and integrated and extended checklists for simulation studies are proposed to guide future research in this area.
Description
Keywords
Operations management, positivism, post-positivism, simulation modelling, theory, Manufacturing Systems, Design Science, Maintenance, Performance, Allocation, Knowledge, Dynamics, Models, Optimization, Methodology, post-positivism, Operations management, simulation modelling, theory, positivism
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Journal of Simulation
Volume
18
Issue
Start Page
687
End Page
715
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 19
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Mar 22, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Mar 22, 2026
Page Views
6
checked on Mar 22, 2026
Google Scholar™


