Transport Priorities, Risk Perception and Worry Associated With Mode Use and Preferences Among Norwegian Commuters

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

There is currently scant research on the role of transport priorities, risk perception and worry for travel mode use and preferences. The present study aims to examine these factors in relation to mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters. A web-based survey was conducted in a randomly obtained representative sample of daily commuters in the extended greater Oslo area (n = 690). The results showed that those who prioritized efficiency and flexibility tended to commute by car, while those who prioritized safety and comfort used public (e.g. metro, tram, and train) or active (e.g. walking and cycling) transport. In a free choice scenario, the respondents who prioritized flexibility reported a preference for using a car, whereas those who prioritized safety and comfort preferred public and active transport for their commuter travels. Risk perception of high impact events, such as terrorism and major accidents, as well as risk perception related to personal impact risks (theft, violence etc.) were related to car use on commuter travels. Transport-related worry exerted weak influences on mode use and preferences. Increased speed on rail transport and more frequent departures may be effective in reducing car use on commuter travels. Risk communication should focus on highlighting the low risk of experiencing security and safety issues in the public transport sector, and this message should be complemented by efforts to reduce the probability of negative events affecting public transport. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Safety, Car use, Public transport, Security, Active transport, Commuting, Safety Programs, Land-Use, Travel, Choice, Personality, Judgments, Attitudes, Behavior, Rates, Mail, ridership - behaviour, Adult, Male, Risk, Car use, 330, Adolescent, mode - bus, Transportation, Anxiety, mode - rail, Surveys and Questionnaires, ridership - perceptions, Humans, Railroads, Aged, Commuting, Norway, mode - subway/metro, ridership - commuting, 380, mode - pedestrian, ridership - mode choice, mode - bike, Consumer Behavior, Middle Aged, Bicycling, mode - car, Motor Vehicles, place - europe, Attitude, Security, Female, Perception, Public transport, Safety, Active transport, Automobiles, planning - surveys

Fields of Science

0502 economics and business, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 05 social sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
47

Source

Accıdent Analysıs And Preventıon

Volume

72

Issue

Start Page

391

End Page

400
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 13

Scopus : 53

PubMed : 2

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 164

SCOPUS™ Citations

53

checked on Mar 23, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

49

checked on Mar 23, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Mar 23, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
4.8551

Sustainable Development Goals