Prognostic Significance of Oligoclonal Bands and Their Subtypes in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Loading...

Date
2025
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the long-term prognostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal band (OCB) positivity and its subtypes (Type 2 and Type 3) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: This retrospective cohort included 2324 RRMS patients diagnosed using the 2017 McDonald criteria. All patients had documented OCB status and at least 2 years of clinical follow-up; a subset had 5-year data. Outcomes included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), annualised relapse rate (ARR), and conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Subgroup analysis compared Type 2 and Type 3 OCBpositive patients. Results: OCB positivity was observed in 82.4 % of patients. At year 2, no significant differences in EDSS, ARR, or SPMS conversion were found between OCB-positive and OCB-negative groups. However, by year 5, the OCBpositive group had a significantly higher rate of conversion to SPMS (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that Type 3 OCB patients had significantly lower EDSS scores at year 2 compared to Type 2 (p < 0.05), but this difference disappeared at year 5. Conclusion: OCB positivity may be associated with a higher risk of progression to SPMS over the long term. Type 3 OCB may indicate a milder early disease course, although its protective effect diminishes over time. Incorporating OCB subtype analysis into RRMS prognosis may enhance early risk stratification.
Description
Keywords
Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Oligoclonal Bands, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Prognostic Biomarkers, Secondary Progressive MS
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Volume
104
Issue
Start Page
106813
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


