Telling Functional Networks Apart Using Ranked Network Features Stability
Loading...
Files
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Nature Portfolio
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
4
OpenAIRE Views
24
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Over the past few years, it has become standard to describe brain anatomical and functional organisation in terms of complex networks, wherein single brain regions or modules and their connections are respectively identified with network nodes and the links connecting them. Often, the goal of a given study is not that of modelling brain activity but, more basically, to discriminate between experimental conditions or populations, thus to find a way to compute differences between them. This in turn involves two important aspects: defining discriminative features and quantifying differences between them. Here we show that the ranked dynamical stability of network features, from links or nodes to higher-level network properties, discriminates well between healthy brain activity and various pathological conditions. These easily computable properties, which constitute local but topographically aspecific aspects of brain activity, greatly simplify inter-network comparisons and spare the need for network pruning. Our results are discussed in terms of microstate stability. Some implications for functional brain activity are discussed.
Description
Keywords
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimers Association Workgroups, Eeg Microstate Duration, Parkinsons-Disease, Brain Networks, Classification Algorithms, Diagnostic Guidelines, National Institute, State, Dementia, Network models, Parkinson's disease, Science, Q, Complex networks, R, [SCCO] Cognitive science, Alzheimer's disease, Article, Alzheimer's disease;Complex networks;Network models;Parkinson's disease, Medicine, Ranked, Network Features, Functional Networks
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
Scıentıfıc Reports
Volume
12
Issue
1
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Downloads
3
checked on Feb 12, 2026
Google Scholar™


