Reduced-Size Left Lateral Segment Grafts in Infants Weighing <10 Kg
Loading...
Files
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Background: Live donor liver transplantation for infants weighing <10 kg has unique complexities, as patient/graft size discrepancies may cause vascular perfusion deficiencies. Failure of the abdominal closure further complicates this already challenging procedure. To overcome these potential problems, several techniques for graft size reduction—either anatomic or nonanatomic—have been proposed in the literature. Technically easier and less time-consuming, nonanatomic size reductions have the advantage of avoiding the risk of injury to the portal pedicle. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of nonanatomic graft size reduction in infants weighing <10 kg with a large estimated preoperative graft recipient weight ratio. Methods: We enrolled 106 infants weighing <10 kg. Of these infants, 50 received reduced-size grafts. The outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: No difference was observed between the groups according to survival and vascular or biliary complications. None of the patients required an open abdomen or mesh closure. Conclusion: Nonanatomic size reduction of left lateral segment grafts can be safely applied without compromising vascular supply, graft function, and patient survival with comparable vascular and biliary complication rates. This technique is safe and efficient in overcoming the complications caused by large-for-size syndrome in infants weighing <10 kg. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
Description
Keywords
Graft Survival, Body Weight, Living Donors, Humans, Infant, Liver Transplantation, Retrospective Studies
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Transplantation Proceedings
Volume
55
Issue
Start Page
1605
End Page
1610
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
SCOPUS™ Citations
3
checked on Mar 25, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
3
checked on Mar 25, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Mar 25, 2026
Google Scholar™


