Comparison of the Effects of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Sexual Function and Quality of Life
Loading...
Files
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Hindawi Ltd
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
It is known that benign gynecological diseases negatively affect sexual function. For this reason, hysterectomy provides improvement in sexual function as well as symptoms such as bleeding and pain. The effects of abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), which are the two most common types of hysterectomy today, are not clear. In our study, we investigated the effects of TAH and TLH on sexual function and quality of life as well as intraoperative and postoperative results. In 329 TLH and 126 TAH patients, we compared both and between themselves preoperatively and postoperatively by using the standardized and validated female sexual function index (FSFI) and European quality of life five-dimension scale (EQ-5D). In conclusion, we found that both types of hysterectomy were effective in improving sexual function, and we concluded that improvement in the laparoscopy group was statistically higher. Patients who require hysterectomy for benign gynecological reasons should be informed that TLH has a more positive effect on sexual function as well as other advantages, and if the patients' main complaint is sexual dysfunction, TLH should be preferred compared to TAH.
Description
Keywords
Benign Disease, Complications, Morbidity, Injuries, Impact, Adult, Leiomyoma, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Hysterectomy, Patient Outcome Assessment, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Period, Sexual Health, Intraoperative Complications, Research Article, Retrospective Studies
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
12
Source
Bıomed Research Internatıonal
Volume
2020
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 9
Scopus : 12
PubMed : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 81
SCOPUS™ Citations
12
checked on Mar 15, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
9
checked on Mar 15, 2026
Downloads
8
checked on Mar 15, 2026
Google Scholar™


