Comparative Efficacy of Rituximab Versus Azathioprine in the Treatment of MOG Antibody-Associated Disease (MOGAD)
Loading...

Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Background: Azathioprine (AZA) and rituximab (RTX) are frequently used drugs in the treatment of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Associated Disease (MOGAD). Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety data of AZA and RTX treatments in MOGAD. Methods: Patients diagnosed according to the 2023 MOGAD diagnostic criteria and receiving AZA or RTX treatment were included in the study. Results: In 142 patients included in the study, the female/male value was 1.2. The rate of OCB positivity in MOGAD patients was 22.6 %. Patients on RTX had higher EDSS values than patients on AZA. However, the RTX group demonstrated a more pronounced improvement in disability, reflected by a greater negative trend in the Delta EDSS values. The attack-free rate was 78 % in the RTX group and 68 % in the AZA group during their treatment period. Both groups had no difference in the time of the first attack. The main factor affecting the time to first attack was having a higher EDSS at the time of treatment initiation. The survival analysis found that EDSS scores improved significantly in patients treated with RTX. Conclusion: Although survival analyses for both treatments appear to be similar, using RTX provides better EDSS scores.
Description
Keywords
Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein, Associated Disease, MOGAD, Azathioprine, Rituximab, Disability, Disability, Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, Azathioprine, associated disease, Rituximab, MOGAD
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Journal of Neuroimmunology
Volume
407
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


