Comparative Analysis of Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Postgraduate Student Selection

dc.contributor.author Altunok, Taner
dc.contributor.author Özpeynirci, Özgür
dc.contributor.author Kazancoglu, Yigit
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Recai
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-16T14:52:16Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-16T14:52:16Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.description.abstract Problem Statement: The educational recourses available for postgraduate education are limited compared with the resources for undergraduate education. An academic advisor is required for each graduate student. The academic staff allocates an important portion of his/her time for graduate studies of his/her students. Since the number of academic staff is limited, the number of graduate students should be limited, too. While a large number of students may attend an undergraduate course, this may not be possible for some graduate courses, which are designed especially for small student groups. Hence, the selection of postgraduate students is an important problem. The postgraduate student selection problem can be defined as selecting a subset of students from the applicants for a postgraduate program. Naturally, this problem is a multi-criteria decision-making problem since each applicant has several attributes and these attributes should be considered simultaneously during the selection process. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of different multi criteria decision-making methods developed for ranking alternatives for the postgraduate student selection problem. The best method will also be used in the student selection process for the Defense Sciences Institute of Turkish Military Academy. Methods: This paper discusses three multi-criteria decision making methods developed for ranking alternatives, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Weighted Product (WP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). A performance measure is defined and the performance values of the methods are compared using real data gathered from the graduates of Defense Sciences Institute of Turkish Military Academy for illustration purposes. Findings and Results: According to the findings, AHP is the best of the three competitors. The ranking obtained by AHP is quite similar to the ranking of students with respect to their cumulative grade point average (CGPA) after their graduation from the program. Conclusions and Recommendations: Considering graduate student selection problem as a multicriteria decision-making problem is very important and enables universities to enroll graduate students with important attributes and a variety of strengths. This paper compares the performance of different multicriteria decision-making methods on graduate student selection problem using a single performance measure. A further study can be making such a comparison with multiple performance measures. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1302-597X
dc.identifier.issn 2528-8911
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-77957593455
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2981
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ani Yayincilik en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eurasıan Journal of Educatıonal Research en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Multicriteria decision making en_US
dc.subject graduate student selection en_US
dc.subject AHP en_US
dc.subject TOPSIS en_US
dc.subject Modified Topsis en_US
dc.subject Performance en_US
dc.title Comparative Analysis of Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Postgraduate Student Selection en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Özpeynirci, Özgür/0000-0002-3695-6587
gdc.author.id Kazancoglu, Yigit/0000-0001-9199-671X
gdc.author.id Kazancoglu, Yigit/0000-0001-9199-671X
gdc.author.id ALTUNOK, TANER/0000-0002-7084-5178
gdc.author.wosid Özpeynirci, Özgür/A-2796-2009
gdc.author.wosid Kazancoglu, Yigit/E-7705-2015
gdc.author.wosid Kazancoglu, Yigit/AAT-5676-2021
gdc.author.wosid ALTUNOK, TANER/AAL-8236-2020
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Kazancoglu, Yigit] Izmir Univ Econ, Dept Business Adm, Izmir, Turkey; [Altunok, Taner] Cankaya Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, Ankara, Turkey; [Özpeynirci, Özgür] Izmir Univ Econ, Dept Logist Management, Izmir, Turkey; [Yilmaz, Recai] Turkish Mil Acad, Def Sci Inst, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 15 en_US
gdc.description.issue 40 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 1 en_US
gdc.description.volume 10 en_US
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 108924
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000285629600001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.scopus.citedcount 19
gdc.virtual.author Kazançoğlu, Yiğit
gdc.virtual.author Özpeynirci, Özgür
gdc.wos.citedcount 16
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 35a34209-587f-49b8-a688-6f3945849812
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c6a6133d-234b-4203-8221-22b84c80ed5d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 35a34209-587f-49b8-a688-6f3945849812
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 7946402e-adc8-4c62-ac59-fbb13820ac91
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication c9b8b195-ae12-421f-b46a-ed1f01ed1cb8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication d61c5ef4-1ebc-4355-bc4f-dfa76978271b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 7946402e-adc8-4c62-ac59-fbb13820ac91

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2132.pdf
Size:
1.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format