Assessing the Effectiveness of Acs Surgical Risk Calculator Versus P-Possum in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity for Major Hepatobiliary Surgery: an Observational Study

dc.contributor.author Karabulut, Ali
dc.contributor.author Umman, Veysel
dc.contributor.author Oral, Güneş
dc.contributor.author Erginoz, Ergin
dc.contributor.author Çarkman, Mehmet Sinan
dc.date.accessioned 2024-08-25T15:13:10Z
dc.date.available 2024-08-25T15:13:10Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract Risk assessment is difficult yet would provide valuable data for both the surgeons and the patients in major hepatobiliary surgeries. An ideal risk calculator should improve workflow through efficient, timely, and accurate risk stratification. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator (SRC) and Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) are surgical risk stratification tools used to assess postoperative morbidity. In this study, preoperative data from 300 patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgeries performed at a single tertiary university hospital were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records and entered into the ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM systems, and the resulting risk scores were calculated and recorded accordingly. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.725) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.791) models showed better morbidity discrimination ability than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.672) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.806) model showed better differentiation success in morbidity than other models. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.888) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.956) models showed better mortality discrimination than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.776) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.948) model showed better mortality differentiation success than the ACS-NSQIP-M1 and P-POSSUM-M1 models. The use of ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM calculators for major hepatobiliary surgeries offers quantitative data to assess risks for both the surgeon and the patient. Integrating these calculators into preoperative evaluation practices can enhance decision-making processes for patients. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the P-POSSUM-M2 model for morbidity and the ACS-NSQIP-M2 model for mortality exhibited superior overall performance. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/MD.0000000000038973
dc.identifier.issn 0025-7974
dc.identifier.issn 1536-5964
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85198597106
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038973
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5445
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Lippincott williams & wilkins en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Medicine en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject ACS score en_US
dc.subject hepatobiliary surgery en_US
dc.subject P-POSSUM score en_US
dc.subject surgical risk calculator en_US
dc.subject Resections en_US
dc.subject Whipple en_US
dc.title Assessing the Effectiveness of Acs Surgical Risk Calculator Versus P-Possum in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity for Major Hepatobiliary Surgery: an Observational Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Umman, Veysel/0000-0003-1760-7346
gdc.author.institutional
gdc.author.scopusid 57211455675
gdc.author.scopusid 47461699000
gdc.author.scopusid 59156619300
gdc.author.scopusid 12763735000
gdc.author.scopusid 59219774800
gdc.author.wosid Umman, Veysel/KDN-0902-2024
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Karabulut, Ali; Oral, Gunes; Erginoz, Ergin; Carkman, Mehmet Sinan] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Umman, Veysel] Izmir Univ Econ, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, Izmir, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 28 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 103 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4400577552
gdc.identifier.pmid 38996128
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001270390400032
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Male
gdc.oaire.keywords Adult
gdc.oaire.keywords 7100
gdc.oaire.keywords Middle Aged
gdc.oaire.keywords hepatobiliary surgery
gdc.oaire.keywords Risk Assessment
gdc.oaire.keywords Quality Improvement
gdc.oaire.keywords P-POSSUM score
gdc.oaire.keywords Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures
gdc.oaire.keywords Postoperative Complications
gdc.oaire.keywords surgical risk calculator
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Female
gdc.oaire.keywords ACS score
gdc.oaire.keywords Retrospective Studies
gdc.oaire.keywords Aged
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.3737945E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 2.082
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.88
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 9
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 3
gdc.scopus.citedcount 3
gdc.wos.citedcount 2
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery e9e77e3e-bc94-40a7-9b24-b807b2cd0319

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5445.pdf
Size:
494.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format