Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1133
Title: | Robust activation detection methods for real-time and offline fMRI analysis | Authors: | Oguz, Kaya Cinsdikici, Muhammed G. Gonul, Ali Saffet |
Keywords: | fMRI Activation estimation Robust regression Instantaneous activation Real-time fMRI Functional Mri Brain Optimization Noise |
Publisher: | Elsevier Ireland Ltd | Abstract: | We propose two contributions with novel approaches to fMRI activation analysis. The first is to apply confidence intervals to locate activations in real-time, and second is a new metric based on robust regression of fMRI signals. These contributions are implemented in our four proposed methods; Instantaneous Activation Method (TAM), Instantaneous Activation Method with Past Blocks (TAMP) for real-time analysis, Task Robust Regression Distance Method (TRRD) for the new metric with robust regression and Instantaneous Robust Regression Distance Method (IRRD) for both contributions. For comparison, a statistical offline method called Task Activation Method (TAM) and a correlation analysis method are also implemented. The methods are initially evaluated with synthetic data generated using two different approaches; first using varying hemodynamic response function signals to simulate a wide range of stimuli responses, along with a Gaussian white noise, and second using no activity state data of a real fMRI experiment, which removes the need to generate noise. The methods are also tested with real fMRI experiments and compared with the results obtained by the widely used SPM tool. The results show that instantaneous methods reveal activations that are lost statistically in an offline analysis. They also reveal further improvements by robust fitting application, which minimizes the outlier effect. TRRD has an area under the ROC curve of 0,7127 for very noisy synthetic images, is reaching up to 0,9608 as the noise decreases, while the instantaneous score is in the range of 0,6124 to 0,8019 in the same noise levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.03.015 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1133 |
ISSN: | 0169-2607 1872-7565 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
148.pdf Restricted Access | 2.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Nov 20, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
checked on Nov 20, 2024
Page view(s)
80
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
6
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.